The brain

[Drich]

yahuh.. Kinda already proved that point beyond contestation and moved on. (lest you change the definition of the word transmitter and receiver.)

No you haven't. Not in the slightest.

I own this book for instance Principles of Neural Science. It's over two inches thick and is the standard textbook for everything brain. Nowhere does it say that the brain is a transmitter and receiver for consciousness and memories.

I've read the entirety of Biophysics of Computation. It is the bible of computational modelling of neurons. It goes into the smallest detail involving ion channels, voltages, cable resistance, secondary messengers for adaptive leakages etc. Nowhere does it say how neurons receive and signals outside of the brain.

Proving this would get you the Nobel prize. But they wouldn't just accept a youtube from a quackpot, an irrelevant page of google results and a youtube clip of someone controlling a remote controlled car using apparatus that can pick up electromagnetic brainwaves. They wouldn't even accept a single peer reviewed paper, which is far beyond your reach.

no, your wrong. I kinda did..

I laid it all nice and simple so someone like you could understand it.

I even posted a youtube video that demonstrated the brain actively transmitting signals, dude wearing head set picking those signals up and using just those signals was able to remotely control a car. (think right car goes right) We also use those signals to activate prosthetics limbs.. Again all these examples demonstrate the brain transmitting a signal. can't argue this unless you change the definition of the word transmit.. The only thing you can argue is the existence of a remote/different dimension where signals are sent and received..

But then comes the articles I posted that say the brian is not designed to host memories and commands.. the idea that the memories and consciousness comes from some place else.

Then to proof that the brain is a receiver is to simply point to the electrical signals our five senses transmit into an electrical signal that the brain unscrambles and displays as sight sound taste and touch. again you can not argue the brain acts as a receiver as it literally follows the literal defination of receiver. The only thig you can argue is the limitations of said signals...