The brain

[Mister Agenda]

no, your wrong. I kinda did..

I laid it all nice and simple so someone like you could understand it.

I even posted a youtube video that demonstrated the brain actively transmitting signals, dude wearing head set picking those signals up and using just those signals was able to remotely control a car. (think right car goes right) We also use those signals to activate prosthetics limbs.. Again all these examples demonstrate the brain transmitting a signal. can't argue this unless you change the definition of the word transmit.. The only thing you can argue is the existence of a remote/different dimension where signals are sent and received..

But then comes the articles I posted that say the brian is not designed to host memories and commands.. the idea that the memories and consciousness comes from some place else.

Then to proof that the brain is a receiver is to simply point to the electrical signals our five senses transmit into an electrical signal that the brain unscrambles and displays as sight sound taste and touch. again you can not argue the brain acts as a receiver as it literally follows the literal defination of receiver. The only thig you can argue is the limitations of said signals...

Yes, if you design a device to pick up brain activity and interpret it, that device can be used to show what the brain activity is, and even to then transmit signals based on that activity that can be used to control other devices. That's not in dispute. The brain can receive and process signals from sensory organs. That is not in dispute either.

What's in dispute is whether our brains function as a receiver to signals that remotely operate our body and as a transmitter to send feedback to that remote operating system. That's your claim. In support of that, you have not shown that such a signal can be detected either directly or by blocking it, and you have not shown that our brains require outside transmission beyond those available to our normal senses in order to function.

When I was in the NSA, we had to guard against TEMPEST gear that could detect the keystrokes on an electronic keyboard, even a pocket calculator. Just because someone could build something to pick up our keystrokes didn't mean our devices were designed with transmitting them in mind. A TEMPEST-hardened device blocked off from emitting detectable signals works just fine. That signals from an electronic keyboard can be detected from some distance away does not imply that such 'transmissions' are anything but a side-effect of their normal functioning. Your argument that our brains operate as transmitters has the same flaw.