Fred, I'm not going to quote for quote you on that last one, but I will say that, in your op, you c&p'd mine and Rhythms question about moral truths, wrote "interesting question that has three answers" and then went on to babble about worldviews in such a way as to make yourself incomprehensible. My responses to you were in response to your "moral truth" answers. You then proceeded to say, "Uh, yeah, I didn't answer them because this is a new thread, duh." Despite the fact that you had said you were answering that question in your OP. If you say you are answering something and fully outline those answers before jumping into your worldview babble, I expect you to stick by what you said you were doing. You're no matador.
P.S. Calling something a war that is not a war is using inflammatory language. It is meant to incite emotion in the face of something that people don't need to be riled up about. You're talking about it as if it is some epidemic of arguments. Why you are taking such an approach is beyond me. I just want to say that I don't have anything against anyone and wasn't implying that I should have one with you. I simply object to the language you use in describing your little echelon of worldviews and I object to you backtracking when given a response that wasn't entirely "Yeah, man. I see how you trying to answer the question of morals and not touching on it at all before delving into worldviews was like answering both questions, even though there was is not but in the question of whether atheism is a worldview."
P.S. Calling something a war that is not a war is using inflammatory language. It is meant to incite emotion in the face of something that people don't need to be riled up about. You're talking about it as if it is some epidemic of arguments. Why you are taking such an approach is beyond me. I just want to say that I don't have anything against anyone and wasn't implying that I should have one with you. I simply object to the language you use in describing your little echelon of worldviews and I object to you backtracking when given a response that wasn't entirely "Yeah, man. I see how you trying to answer the question of morals and not touching on it at all before delving into worldviews was like answering both questions, even though there was is not but in the question of whether atheism is a worldview."
