The best thing I've heard recently (from this forum, sorry, can't remember who said it) is that the Bible can either be the claim or the evidence. It can't be both otherwise you rely on circular logic. I've started using that one recently and the theists don't know how to respond.
If it's evidence then we can evaluate it along with all the other evidence and discard most of it as being inconsistent with what we know.
If it's a claim then as in the OP, what evidence is there to back it up? As far as I can tell, there is barely anything. Again, we can discard it.
If it's evidence then we can evaluate it along with all the other evidence and discard most of it as being inconsistent with what we know.
If it's a claim then as in the OP, what evidence is there to back it up? As far as I can tell, there is barely anything. Again, we can discard it.
