(September 12, 2011 at 6:01 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Well calling me grade school names does nothing to prove your assertion that you are being “reasonable” in the slightest.
Oh, no. It can be reasonably asserted that you are a twat. I have no doubt about it.
Quote:Yes it does, see below.
No, it doesn't. I saw below and you have yet to take every other belief and disbelief individuals have into account. If you think for a second that a person can live their whole life only believing or disbelieving one single thing, you are deluded. Wait . . .
Quote:I was just proving your assertion that worldviews cannot be based off of one disbelief wrong, don’t comprehend it or anything.
You didn't prove shit. "Based off" is very different from "is." Still, even "based off" doesn't apply to atheism.
Quote:[img] http://www.duramaxforum.com/forum/attach...crying.jpg [/img]
Lovely.
(September 12, 2011 at 5:44 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: What ultimate authority are you using to judge my ultimate authority?
None, dur. There is no ultimate authority. Your ultimate authority is yourself and you don't even realize it. Like every other deluded bible thumper, you cherry pick the bible and act according to your own whims, bending scripture to suit what you want out of life and what you are willing to do/not do, tell people to do/tell people not to do. Scary really, but you are your own god.
Quote:Since you claim to be philosophically knowledgeable it should be an easy enough question to answer.
I made that claim? You're doing that pretending Shell said something she didn't say thing again. It's a good thing most people here know I wouldn't call myself "philosophically knowledgeable" like some self absorbed twit.
