Why believe the bible?

[Angrboda]

just like in the passage I left to you above. Adam was not uses as a name till after God man the man and placed him in the garden That Adam technically was the first man and the man created with a soul. The man outside simply resembled God/was genetically compatible with the man inside the garden and his people.

Well, you're ignoring that Genesis 1 explicitly states that "adam" created at that time was created in God's image. But I'm curious to know upon what basis do you rest this theory about the one referring to mankind in Genesis 1, and that it was a proper name in the second? Are you trying to suggest that God has the form of an ape man? That would be contrary to all Jewish theology up to the present day. Does God have DNA?

As I'm sure your well aware of but dishonestly hiding the fact that the hebrew word Adam also refers to Human kind. as my passage describes as all passages describe in the english when refering to gen1 NIV, NKJV KJV ETR ASV NASV all refer gen1 adam to humanity or man kind.
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H120&t=KJV

Your citation of Strong's doesn't support the distinction you are making. What does? (According to the interlinear bible I consulted, Genesis 2 refers to "the man" (ha'adam). Is that a proper name?)

According to most 'traditional' interpretations of ha'adam, the term is usually translated into human in the Priestly creation. However, in the Yahwist one ha'dam [sic] is translated either into human, Adam, or man, depending on the context.

Ha’adam : Adam, man or human - The Importance of Interpretation in Biblical Translation