(July 2, 2018 at 12:55 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(July 2, 2018 at 12:50 pm)Drich Wrote: just like in the passage I left to you above. Adam was not uses as a name till after God man the man and placed him in the garden That Adam technically was the first man and the man created with a soul. The man outside simply resembled God/was genetically compatible with the man inside the garden and his people.
Well, you're ignoring that Genesis 1 explicitly states that "adam" created at that time was created in God's image. But I'm curious to know upon what you basis do you rest this theory about the one referring to mankind in Genesis 1, and that it was a proper name in the second? Are you trying to suggest that God has the form of an ape man? That would be contrary to all Jewish theology up to the present day.
what a dishonest person you are. I cut and pasted a copy of an actual translation where the word humanity was used instead of the word or nae Adam and then gave a comprehensive list of a dozen other well known and well received bibles who all translate the hebrew word "adam" in Genesis 1 as mankind humanity ect..
Are you so foolish as to not understand the hebrew word Adam is not limited to a name?
or is this where you believe you own hype that "i truly don't know what I know?" and all you got to do is post a pic of a page from a lexicon?
Have you forgotten I brought that particular piece of source material to this website under much mocking and hate as you people did not even know what one was?!?! Now you pretend that I cant use one or don't have access to one?
Maybe it is you who doesn't know what she thinks she knows...
