How the black man embraced Christianity

[Angrboda]

Dripshit the very moment you start with bible mythology you lose all credibility.  Xtians as a general rule are full of shit.  You are merely their standard bearer.

No one ever heard of any "gospel of mark" until the late 2d century when the names were attached to give them some sort of credibility - credibility if one is a gullible shit like you, that is.  So the moment you start talking about "mark" in 47 AD you are just an asshole.  But then, you've been an asshole since Day #1 so nothing new.

what a weak willed single minded thing to say or do. If someone opens with something you do not like to you that person looses all credibility. no wonder your side of the election lost if your peers think as poorly as you do.

You are so intolerant you can not be bother to look at a simple paragraph as a whole and determine what is good or is bad. you look for things that allow to dismiss everything as a whole. how is that advanced thinking? 

To me this is closed minded thinking as you will not allow yourself to be exposed to anything you do not already accept. how does that not raise an alarm in your mind? oh that's right you stopped reading 3 words in.

Addressing the content of your message:
Jesus you are either willfully the dumbest person on this website or this is simply the result of shutting down anything you don't want to hear for decades you just absorbe things that fit your narrative despite little things called evidence and provenance.

Because in truth the gospel of mark has been traced to 47 AD

• Perkins, Pheme (1998). "The Synoptic Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles: Telling the Christian Story". In Barton, John. The Cambridge companion to biblical interpretation. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 241–58. ISBN 978-0-521-48593-7.
  

did you see that you old goat? do you know what I just did? it took the conversation up a notch by taking my word and bndng to the work sited above who was published westminster john knox press.. which is indeed an authority on the matter like it or not..

Oddly enough, Wikipedia suggests that Mark "probably" dates to 66-70 AD, and they use the same work as a reference for that date. Where are you pulling the 47 AD date from, specifically?

Mark was the earliest narrative account of Jesus. References to war in Judea (Mark 13:5-8, 14-19) as well as to persecution (8:34-8; 13:9-13) suggested that it was written during Nero's persecution of Christians in Rome or the Jewish revolt in Judea (c. 66-70 CE; see Donahue, 'Windows and Mirrors').

The Synoptic Gospels and Acts of the Apostles : Telling the Christian Story. Pheme Perkins.