RE: Josephus and other contemporaries on Jesus
July 4, 2018 at 1:18 am
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2018 at 1:23 am by TimOneill.)
(July 4, 2018 at 12:53 am)Tizheruk Wrote: The only support i require is your article a Carriers they both stand a testaments to your inadequacy
Another weak blurt. I answered Carrier's attack in detail. At length. With a careful deconstruction of his argument that showed he was dead wrong. And Carrier - who is usually on a hair-trigger to respond to the slightest criticism - has been asked how he would respond and yet has ... declined to do so. So perhaps you could actually detail how my reply to him is "inadequate". Simply blurting that it is is not an argument, I'm afraid.
Quote:and as for engagement i pretty sure responding is engagement .
Oh yeah, well your [sic] a poopyhead, so there!" may be 'engagement' in you are four years old, but I was asking if anyone here is capable of detailed discussion based on the source material. Yet again we see you and the other boneheaded jerk here prancing around and squealing and yet doing everything you can to avoid actually tangling with the topics at hand. If I am so "inadequate", "feckless", "bullshit" and "weak" surely my arguments could be dispatched very easily. So what seems to be the problem?
Quote:Yes they do regardless of what you and your feckless cheerleaders say .
Gosh. Okay, please cite some of the historians who use Bayes the way Carrier does. See if you can actually back up your weak farting noises with some substance for once.
(July 4, 2018 at 1:13 am)Tizheruk Wrote:(July 4, 2018 at 1:10 am)Minimalist Wrote: Oh yeah... Another one of those!Too many it's reached critical mass really these apologist dorks are like rabbits .I stopped taking them seriously ages ago. I put them in the same category as young earth creationists at this point .Lots of sites and books very little sense between the covers .
How many times have we seen that routine?
Oh wow. So we're now reached the "you're not a real atheist, you're actually a Christian" gambit in what seems like record time. As I note every time this pathetic ruse is tried: I have a posting history as an atheist that goes back to 1992, I'm a former state president of the Australian Skeptics and I've been a paid up, subscribing member of the Atheist Foundation of Australia for many years. But if you really want to go for this weak tactic - try this: find anything that proves I am actually a Christian and not an atheist. Anything. You have 26 years worth of online material to work with, so it should not be hard to prove I'm lying. Good luck.
