(July 6, 2018 at 3:08 pm)Drich Wrote:(July 4, 2018 at 6:12 am)Kit Wrote: It was also easier to be told to believe when the majority of the population was illiterate and could not read the books themselves. It's astounding how little critical thinking goes into reading the bible now by theists who are literate, for there is no greater reason for atheism than actually reading the bible.
Wow such a nice blanket statement/stereotype. Riddle me this mr thinker... what is the difference between make degrogitory stereotypical statement about a man's skin color verses how you perceive he thinks? Rather which is worse?
Is Hating a man because he is a shade lighter or darker some how 'better' in your enlighten state that using the same EXACT SAME HATE to disparage a man on how or what you perceive he thinks?
Yeah.. good job sport.. You certainly showing us who the enlightened are...
It is not far fetched, nor a derogatory or stereotypical statement, to bring attention to the fact that theists generally do not think critically about the bible.
Passionately disliking a man for his religious beliefs is far better than hating him because of the color of his skin, no contest.
Well, you know, someone has to do it. Too bad you haven't been enlightened one bit, however.
