Hello.....I have a little problem

[Statler Waldorf]

Set of beliefs, Stat. What about that is fucking impossible for you to understand?

Nothing, I understand it completely. You base your set of beliefs off of your atheistic worldview, I base mine off of my Christian theistic worldview.

That scripture was used by an atheist, meaning he doesn't believe it for a second and it is obvious enough, given his open atheism.

So you are saying he believes arrogance and pride are good things?

Therefore, it isn't preaching. It was pointing out that you behave in a manner that contradicts your ultimate source of guidance.

Where does it say the preacher has to believe what he is preaching to be true in order for it to be considered preaching?

You repeatedly say that your stance is logical and truthful, also that it is based on the Bible.

All true.

Whether or not a person believes god owns them is irrelevant.

No it isn’t, it’s the very foundation we use to shape our morals. If I own myself I determine my own morality, if something greater than me owns me I must conform my morality to that.

As a Christian, you cherrypick the shit out of your own guidebook, thus shaping your own views. You use what you want to use and throw the rest away,

Proof of this?

Jeffrey Dahmer quotes, classy.

He didn’t think anyone owned him and made up his own morality too you know.

I didn't say that I had no standard, chowderhead. I said that I had no ultimate authority, which was what you asked me. You're doing that backtrack and use different words to make it sound like Shell said something she didn't thing again. You might as well outright lie, you're so fucking dishonest.

Philosophically speaking ultimate standard and ultimate authority for truth are the same thing dunderhead. In order to give you a chance to backtrack since you seem to have realized how ridiculous your relativistic claims were I will ask the question again but use the phrase you seem to understand. Shell, what is your ultimate standard for truth?