Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 24, 2025, 12:18 am
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Media v
Star Trek (this can't be right)

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Star Trek (this can't be right)
Pat Mustard Offline
God! Theresa, I forgot me fecking trousers!
****
Religious Views: the Disc's first ligthning proof atheist
Posts: 8280
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation: 42
#29
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right)
July 8, 2018 at 5:18 pm
(July 8, 2018 at 4:29 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(July 8, 2018 at 11:54 am)Wololo Wrote: The nut was Jonathan "Duchess" Archer of the first 2 1/2 seasons of Enterprise.

Ok, I misunderstood you.  I have watched 'Enterprise' - in an admittedly desultory fashion - and I don't seem to recall Archer being a conspiracy theorist.  Did I miss something?

Boru

The way he talks about the Vulcans the first two seasons, it's almost like a Goebbels giving out about the Jews. Everything that goes wrong, the Vulcans are at fault. A Vulcan ship shows up in the locality, they're spying on him. T'pol makes a suggestion, "I'm not good enough, is that it?" The Vulcans don't get there quick enough when he needs their help, they're trying to make him fail. They offer help when he doesn't think he needs it, they're trying to show him up.

Watch the SFDebris Enterprise reviews (it's where the name Future Guy was invented for the temporal cold war enemy).
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Media v
Star Trek (this can't be right)

Messages In This Thread
Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Silver - July 7, 2018 at 1:31 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Jackalope - July 7, 2018 at 1:43 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Silver - July 7, 2018 at 1:43 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by pocaracas - July 7, 2018 at 1:48 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Rev. Rye - July 9, 2018 at 9:01 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by KevinM1 - July 10, 2018 at 1:37 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by The Valkyrie - July 7, 2018 at 2:20 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Anomalocaris - July 7, 2018 at 8:58 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by KevinM1 - July 8, 2018 at 2:21 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Pat Mustard - July 7, 2018 at 4:21 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Silver - July 7, 2018 at 4:35 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by ignoramus - July 7, 2018 at 7:56 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by brewer - July 7, 2018 at 10:37 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by AFTT47 - July 7, 2018 at 11:19 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Pat Mustard - July 8, 2018 at 5:04 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by KevinM1 - July 8, 2018 at 1:17 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Ravenshire - July 8, 2018 at 2:33 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Pat Mustard - July 8, 2018 at 6:23 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Pat Mustard - July 8, 2018 at 7:42 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Pat Mustard - July 8, 2018 at 11:54 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Pat Mustard - July 8, 2018 at 5:18 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Angrboda - July 8, 2018 at 3:40 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by KevinM1 - July 9, 2018 at 12:31 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Pat Mustard - July 9, 2018 at 8:10 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Anomalocaris - July 9, 2018 at 1:27 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by pocaracas - July 9, 2018 at 9:12 am
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by vulcanlogician - July 10, 2018 at 4:52 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Amarok - July 10, 2018 at 4:54 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by The Valkyrie - July 10, 2018 at 5:10 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by vulcanlogician - July 10, 2018 at 5:57 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Ravenshire - July 10, 2018 at 10:34 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by KevinM1 - July 13, 2018 at 10:33 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by The Valkyrie - July 10, 2018 at 5:05 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Amarok - July 10, 2018 at 5:12 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by The Valkyrie - July 10, 2018 at 5:19 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Amarok - July 10, 2018 at 5:24 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by Ravenshire - July 10, 2018 at 7:54 pm
RE: Star Trek (this can't be right) - by vulcanlogician - July 13, 2018 at 11:18 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Star Trek films LinuxGal 78 9516 December 29, 2022 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Star Wars - does it have a future? The Valkyrie 129 18212 May 9, 2020 at 5:22 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Horrific Scene in Star Trek: Picard AFTT47 44 5472 February 23, 2020 at 8:44 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Star Trek - seen them all? onlinebiker 22 2523 February 6, 2020 at 5:36 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Star Trek: Picard - Way Better then I had Hoped AFTT47 17 1895 January 29, 2020 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: Mr Greene
  Jeep Wrangler 1 star Euro NCAP safety rating! ignoramus 2 587 December 9, 2018 at 6:26 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  New Star Wars movie is well received by the critics. Whateverist 105 19308 January 2, 2018 at 5:51 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Star Trek Discovery Sucks Mechaghostman2 23 4497 December 23, 2017 at 10:47 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Gotye -Star Wars ignoramus 1 556 June 8, 2017 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: snerie
  Star Wars: The Force Accelerated Jehanne 1 710 December 30, 2016 at 11:40 am
Last Post: TheRealJoeFish



Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)