(July 9, 2018 at 2:39 pm)Drich Wrote:(July 9, 2018 at 1:00 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Already covered in my previous post. That Arabic version was known in 1909. How is that either a "discovery" or "new evidence" ?
This is presuming Josephus said any such thing. I don't think your explanation is consistent with the passage, and even if it is, it's just another ad hoc explanation.
http://www.josephus.org/testimonium.htm
This is the 9 points that result in the "1995 new view of the testimonium."
If you will note I simply cut and pasted the website's own view of this material word for word. if you are not happy with the synopsis then again write the website. I'm sure they will all stay up at night till your happy.
I'd rather you take some responsibility for the shit you post, dipshit. So what you posted is simply crap. Good old Drich.