Quote: please bruh.. we have 15 of the 27 books represented in this so call "few second century fragments"
No, you don't fuckhead. The 4 earliest scraps ( actually 5 since 64 and 67 always seem to be combined) all date from the mid to late second century and have been read by people who, unlike you, know what the fuck they are talking about.
#4 dates from the 2d to the third century ( I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt on this one ) contains a handful of excerpts from "Luke."
#52 dates close to the end of the 2d century. It is a credit card sized fragment which contains 114 recognizable letters and they are all from "John."
#64 ( and the erstwhile #67 which seems to have been part of the same page hence the combination ) are supposedly of "Matthew."
#30 is a couple of sections of 1 and 2 Thessalonians. It is usually considered 3d century but the earliest possible dates bleed over into the 2d so I am giving you that one too...just to show that atheists can be charitable! So add "Paul" to the list.
#90 is a small fragment of John but John is already on the list so that doesn't help your total, does it?
So I get 4 books from the NT not 15 and all dated to the late 2d ( at best ) century and since no one is arguing that there weren't xhristards in the late 2d century that doesn't help you either, does it? There were plenty of people alive at the time who believed in Mithras, Isis, Zeus and Jupiter. You would be the first to say that they were wrong.
Well, asshole. You are wrong too. Your fucking god is no more real than theirs.
