RE: Josephus and other contemporaries on Jesus
July 12, 2018 at 4:46 pm
(This post was last modified: July 12, 2018 at 4:50 pm by JairCrawford.)
(July 12, 2018 at 10:58 am)Minimalist Wrote:(July 10, 2018 at 1:10 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: A silence may raise questions, or cause one to take notice, and look for a more substantial case. However, unless you can make a valid case for the argument from silence, you can’t just make things up, and insert them into the silence. It can be done, but the argument from silence (legitimate) isn’t an easy case to make.
There is no contemporary evidence that any of your horseshit is true. Since it is YOUR HORSESHIT you bear the burden of proof. Feel free to call us if you find something, in the meanwhile go blow your apologetics out your ass.
Once again we see RR expounding the Great Xtian Paradox: "Jesus was so fucking dangerous and important that the authorities had no choice but to break every rule in their own fucking book to deal with him while, AT THE VERY SAME TIME, he was so fucking insignificant that no one in the first century wrote a fucking word about him.
Make up your fucking minds, assholes.
Jesus' sentencing has always been unique. But this is the first place I'm hearing an argument that a Roman prefect would not do what Pilate is depicted doing in the Gospel accounts. Can you elaborate on this a bit?
(July 12, 2018 at 4:25 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Let;s take a speific example. The feeding of the multitudes. I'll quote the texts below. I;ve arranged them in chronological order.
Now...lay aside the mundane details of the story for a moment. What is it about? What is the theological message of the story? Is that message important?
The meaning of the numbers have been lost to our knowledge, but both feedings are very important theologically because if we go on reading, we will find out that after both feedings the disciples went out with Jesus on the Sea of Galilee, and eventually they would fear of starving for lack of food. So already their faith wavered.