Josephus and other contemporaries on Jesus

[RoadRunner79]

I don't think that once you are making a claim, you can then fall back on skepticism.  At least not without retracting the claim.  Even as supporting evidence, it isn't that strong, when you start asking (looking at) who and where you think should have wrote otherwise.

Don't ever explain why you're skeptical, then you can't be skeptical anymore! Skepticism is only valid if you don't give reasons for it!

---

I have to say, JairCrawford, to me, has been like a breath of fresh air for being a theist notable for her courtesy and reasonableness.

I think that you can give reason for being skeptical, or for why the evidence is not sufficient. There where claims being made, that go beyond being skeptical.

And I agree, Jair has a lot of patience and the spirit of a moderator. I wish I could be more like that.