Paul's Writings Underpin Western Thought

[Amarok]

Where you not just criticizing for lack of substance in a post? 

Yup and your posts never fail in that regard 

 Anyway, if you want to discuss any of those reasons you claim for why the counter arguments are not good, or to offer the logic for why the original claim is, feel free.   

Once again my answer remains the same 

However at this point you two have been telling me about Carrier for quite a while now, and haven't provided anything that puts him here on earth or makes him real.    I think he is a myth.  Conjured up to give some appeal to authority to the mythicists hooey. Now unless you want to tackle the argument, rather than go after the person, I'm done.

1. Your first statement is absurd and even if Carrier did not exist that would not make his writings on historicity of Jesus invalid he could really be named bob and be a janitor does not make his words any less true . And Trying to make Carrier a Jesus proxy and comparing us to a cult i suppose how unoriginal and ironic.

2. And i already addressed you non arguments by pointing out Carrier( existent or not ) already addressed them as that what your criticizing . Which really only leaves the person left to criticize for such awful nonsense .So you were done before this started.