Paul's Writings Underpin Western Thought

[RoadRunner79]

However Carrier is far from the mainstream consensus.  

Tell me something, RR.  Are you incapable or just unwilling to think for yourself.  Why do you feel compelled to select "experts" ( and you mainly seem to choose those who tell you what you want to hear ) to lead you by the nose?

I know xhristards are sheep but you could put up a little resistance.

I select experts by what they have to say (and the reasons they give).   You may note, that I'm the one asking for the evidence or reason here (quite often).  I don't just dismiss him as a mythicists, but address  the issues with the reasoning.

I'm not the one dismissing a priori, as just apologetics.

---

Dr. Richard Carrier advocates a minority hypothesis; so what?  With respect to low-level NT criticism, Dr. Carrier's views are completely mainstream.

He desperate to misrepresent your position and make baseless accusations of bias . And then misrepresents Carrier and shows he has fuck all understanding of his work  . Then actually has the balls to declare he's listen or weighed the evidence before deciding. I'm shocked reality didn't collapse  into a singularity of bullshit from that statement .

What do you feel that I misrepresented from Carrier's work?