RE: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2
August 20, 2018 at 7:54 pm
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2018 at 8:03 pm by Joods.)
(August 20, 2018 at 7:46 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: This case is just a transparent cover for anti-religious bigotry. The request was made by a lawyer in bad-faith with the intention of creating conflict. The very sample lawyer asked for a cake to Satan smoking a joint, then one with a Pentagram, then one with that included an upside down cross and a fully functioning vibrator. Anyone can see that this is just harassment of Philips because of his religion. The trans activist lawyer's request was bogus from the start.
It wouldn't matter if she asked for one cake or 40. He has a pattern of denying the LGBT community goods and services that he happily provides to those outside of that community. The lawyer has proven that beyond a reasonable doubt.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.