RE: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2
August 20, 2018 at 9:57 pm
(August 20, 2018 at 9:03 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(August 20, 2018 at 8:42 pm)Joods Wrote: No it isn't. I addressed the part of your quote that I wanted to address. That you don't agree with my opinion doesn't have fuck all to do with quoting someone out of context. Again, if you think I broke a rule, report my ass.I'm not saying that you are quoting me out of context, but that leaving information out intentionally from the story is similar. It's a mis-characterization. And has nothing to do with our disagreement.
Yet you were the one who initially mentioned it. So it has plenty to do with our disagreement.
Quote:Quote:The sample size would be the number of time a request was made, regardless of who made it, and the refusals that went along with it. It's been mentioned that the lawyer has made numerous requests for other types of cakes only to be continuously shot down. Every time.Again, how much data are you basing this on? And are you including all the information?
See above.
Read what I wrote. If it isn't good enough for you, that is your problem. You're the one asking for specifics here. What we do know is that this baker has an obvious problem with anyone who doesn't fit his religious narrative. Refusal to provide goods and services to the LGBT community that he would willingly provide to others who fall outside of that community, is proof of that. The fact that there have been lawsuits about this should be all the samples you need.
He's a bigot. I guess you're too afraid to admit that because he follows the same god as you do so I guess in your mind you owe him some sort of backing here. I bet he gives fuck all to what is being said about him in these forums. He doesn't need you to have his back here or anywhere else. It just makes you look small minded.
Quote:Quote:You don't get to set the perimeters for my opinions.
Ok... but your opinion doesn't seemed to be based on the truth of the matter.
It's based on what the public has access to. And what the public has access to are court documents which clearly show the bigoted nature of this guy. There's your truth. The fact that you are okay with this guy hiding behind his religion to discriminate against others is just sad. I don't think that's what your god meant when he said to love thy neighbor.
Quote:Quote:I like how you totally ignored being called out for what you said. Dodge much? You can still Fuck off.
It wasn't important to the discussion.
Then you should have left that out entirely. Knowing that I have a daughter with MR, and that you and I were conversing directly with one another, this was a cheap shot and you knew it. You're no Christian. Your god would not want you to behave this way.
Quote:(I thought it was a diversion to make this about me actually)
Narcissist. Using a disability that thousands of people have, for your own personal gain is fucking stupid. Shame on you.
Quote: We can call it a cognitive impairment if you like. I wasn't using it in a derogatory sense, but as a difficulty in understanding and being able to accurately describe the situation.
How about we not mention it in the first place because it has no business being in this thread. And yeah - you intentionally used it in a derogatory sense.
I love how when people get called out for doing that, that's the first thing they say. "Oh, but I didn't mean it that way." Yes, you did and so does everyone else who chooses to use it in an argument.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.