RE: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2
August 21, 2018 at 1:27 am
(August 21, 2018 at 1:09 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Your still ignoring the fact that the customer gave the significance of the pink and blue colors and what they wanted to convey.bold mine.
Because according to paragraph 129, it's what the shop owner specifically asks for. My god man, PLEASE LEARN TO READ.
Quote:And what the cakeshop denied.
The shop owner denied it after he found out the details of the event. Duh.
Quote:You can call that opinion, bit you still are creating lies to slander a person. If he had subsequently denied a cake without this symbology, then you may have a point, and I would stand with you in descriminating against a person. Bit that is not the case.
Also it’s not about having an opinion at odds with mine; that I am comparing to prooftexting and quoting out of context. I don’t think that this is difficult to understand.
Yet you can't even comprehend a single paragraph (129) that's been pointed out for every single fucking person reading this thread to see.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
