Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2

[Joods]

These laws are enacted to prevent such things as the de facto segregation that occurred during the Jim Crow era.  Majorities can and do make products and services inaccessible by implementing de facto networks of discrimination.

Even when the specific concerns of LBGTQ activists are wholly legitimate, any comparison between those struggles and the oppression and indignity of African-Americans living under segregation belittles the significance of the civil rights movement and is both inappropriate and shameful.

Everyone is entitled to equal protection under the law. The fact that you can't put your bigotry aside simply because you don't like who the laws protect, speaks more about your lack of morals than anything else.

The lawyer would only be engaged in anti-Christian harassment if: (1) she was doing it repeatedly, which remains to be seen...

All the evidence seems to point in that direction. Or at least Philips has very good reasons for believing that the same individual asked for a wide variety of bizarre and offensive requests - marajauna cakes, pentagrams, a dildo topper, etc.

Read the complaint. I know you like to ignore me when I make valid points, but there was nothing in that 52 page pile of bullshit that proved she alone was solely responsible for all the requests he denied. The fact that you keep insisting that she was, goes to show you don't even bother properly reading the links you provide.