(May 20, 2009 at 5:22 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(May 20, 2009 at 7:06 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: No you haven't Frodo, you have claimed it and you have argued it but in each and every case you have met a wall of opposition that basically says (at best for you) that the issue remains unresolved and, because you are claiming something which cannot be demonstrated, something extraordinary you are STILL required to supply extraordinary evidence ... only you can't because you have none.
We're not talking proof of God's existence here, because that's not possible scientifically. To prove God scientifically would require god like measuring tools. The descriptors of God are human descriptors with inherent human limitations.
Frodo ... I am aware of your claim, I happen to dispute it and so, as far as I am aware, do many others in this forum. I don't care if your God is the biggest baddest motherfucker ever to grace this universe or any other, if something affects our universe then it must leave a trail of evidence ... to do otherwise is something extraordinary and therefore you must provide extraordinary evidence to support your claim.
(May 20, 2009 at 5:22 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: The theological questions are not scientific questions requiring evidence. Even consideration of the problems are anti science.
To insist, as you are doing, that the evidence for your God is beyond science, reason and the accepted rules of verifiable evidence acquisition (that your god is above and beyond the accepted rules of science & evidence) is nothing but special pleading.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
