RE: Law versus morality
September 2, 2018 at 2:01 am
(This post was last modified: September 2, 2018 at 2:01 am by robvalue.)
Maybe it would be interesting to list some things that would change, if law took on moral consensus. I mentioned one already, adultery. I think this represents government not being involved in who you have sex with, as long as it's a consensual adult. The first part is giving you maximum liberty, and the second is protecting the vulnerable.
So if this changed, what would happen? Rape cases are hard enough to prove, so consensual sex with a third party complainant would be even harder. Making accusations would be extremely easy on the flimsiest of grounds, and would take up a whole lot of police/court time. I think this shows how practicality enters into the equation as well.
So if this changed, what would happen? Rape cases are hard enough to prove, so consensual sex with a third party complainant would be even harder. Making accusations would be extremely easy on the flimsiest of grounds, and would take up a whole lot of police/court time. I think this shows how practicality enters into the equation as well.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum