When is a Religious Belief Delusional?

[Amarok]

Wholly hell Wooters view of objective secular morality ontology and perspective norms is simplistic .

---

After 8 pages of drivel I think the answer to the OP is "Always."

Oh come now drivel is a compliment to Wooters nonsense

---

Depends on the human life, I'd reckon. 

The answer to this, though..

Some animals are considered to be of almost no value, or even negative value. Is this in any way objective? No.

-Is a fairly easy yes.  Ask anyone who produces anything why pest species have a negative value.  They can give you the dollars and cents on that one.  You pay that negative value yourself, in cost.

The concept of inherent value isn't incoherent so much as that this concept is attached to incoherent things and, particularly with the religious, described incoherently.  Inherent value is a good kid, with dick friends.

True very true