Peterson's 12 Rules For Life, have you heard of this?

[The Grand Nudger]

I haven't taken any stance about white supremacists, so I'm not much interested in those articles.  White supremacy is a bad idea, and I have little interest in it.

That's a shame, because I think they might help you to identify those moments and narratives in our conversation (and probably your life outside the boards) that could cause a rational person to mistake you for a white supremacist.  

They might also help you to figure out precisely why a guy like peterson is on the alt-right internet pipeline.

As for the IQ links, I've read them, Khemikal, and have already said so.  If you are claiming that I'm lying about that, then say so.  I guess that's what you'd expect from a "slimy piece of shit," eh?  I have no problem discussing any of them, and there's even a chance that one of them might lead you to suggest an actual plan for changing anything at all.

The stuff about IQ is all in accord with what I've said about that issue.  As I said before, your use of 10% heritability in raging against the conspiracies of science are pretty clearly dishonest, since we were talking about income disparity.  What, pray tell, is the heritability of IQ at working age?  10%, is it?

But like I say, it doesn't matter.  I didn't say you had to be honest-- only that you had to properly cite your claim.  You clearly won't-- that's fine.  It means that either you don't know how to cite things, or that you aren't willing to.

Unless you say something interesting, or make an actual point that you will back up with specific supported facts, then I'm done for now.  If you want to make that citation after all, then PM me, and I'll send the money any time.  I know exactly where it would come from, and why you don't want to make it-- because it turns out you were just parroting things that I had already said, and you prefer not to reveal that.

Good luck with that.

Well, wonderful, then you already know which study is being cited in those links I gave you.  Though that makes the last few pages of your posts more than a little bit baffling.  Additionally, since you've read all of those, do you now have a more accurate picture of why scientific racism is a scam?  Why the notion of "race and intelligence" gets rightfully poo-pood not because of politics, but because it's fundamentally misinformed, and why studies on iq and income have to be controlled to zero out known effects?