RE: Religion and the law
September 20, 2018 at 7:45 am
(This post was last modified: September 20, 2018 at 7:45 am by Angrboda.)
(September 20, 2018 at 3:08 am)robvalue Wrote: Let's assume we're in a secular country (in theory or in practice). Feel free to comment on how answers would vary across different countries. We have interactions between religion and the law, and I'm concerned here about how this works on a personal level.
1) Informally, what constitutes a religious belief? How is it any different from a regular belief? What elements must it have, other than calling it a religious belief?
2) Legally, what constitutes a religious belief?
It tends to be easier to identify common traits among paradigm cases than to establish it from a definitional or a priori standpoint. To that end, most definitions of religion with respect to law tend to be circular. Religion is what the religious do. The religious are religious because they follow a religion. And around and around it goes. Frameworks like Ninian Smart's seven dimensions of religion are helpful, but ultimately that too is simply reasoning from paradigm cases. As Ed Meese remarked of pornography, the standard appears to be, "I'll know it when I see it."