(May 21, 2009 at 3:47 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:(May 21, 2009 at 7:27 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: I don't care if your God is the biggest baddest motherfucker ever to grace this universe or any other, if something affects our universe then it must leave a trail of evidence ... to do otherwise is something extraordinary and therefore you must provide extraordinary evidence to support your claim.
The claim is that evidence is impossible to determine without the knowledge of a god.
Yes, I know what the claim is and I dispute it as would any reasoning, objective scientist.
(May 21, 2009 at 7:27 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(May 21, 2009 at 3:47 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: To insist, as you are doing, that the evidence for your God is beyond science, reason and the accepted rules of verifiable evidence acquisition (that your god is above and beyond the accepted rules of science & evidence) is nothing but special pleading.
Science doesn't cover it. You either accept that or continue with a very limited veiw of the world. A simplistic - touch it we can know it world, without the capacity of thought.
Yes so you claim yet the fact remains that in order to affect this universe, this world, a trail of evidence must (at least potentially) be left ... it is a logical impossibility for it to be otherwise. Let me frame it in a question ... do you know of ANY other thing besides your god that can affect this universe (this world), is accepted as real by the majority of academics and not leave some kind of evidence?
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
