Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 8, 2025, 10:18 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
(September 14, 2018 at 2:11 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: The threat to democracy — from the left

Quote:For several years now, scholars have argued that the world is experiencing a “democratic recession.” They have noted that the movement of countries toward democracy has slowed or stopped and even, in some places, reversed. They also note a general hollowing out of democracy in the advanced, industrial world. When we think about this problem, inevitably and rightly we worry about President Trump, his attacks on judges, the free press and his own Justice Department. But there is also a worrying erosion of a core democratic norm taking place on the left.

It has become commonplace to hear cries on the left to deny controversial figures on the right a platform to express their views. Colleges have disinvited speakers such as Condoleezza Rice and Charles Murray. Other campuses were unwilling or unable to allow conservative guests to actually speak, with protests overwhelming the events.

A similar controversy now involves Stephen K. Bannon, who, in recent months, has been making the rounds on the airwaves and in print — including an interview I did with him on CNN. Some have claimed that Bannon, since leaving the administration, is simply unimportant and irrelevant and thus shouldn’t be given a microphone. But if that were the case, surely the media, which after all is a for-profit industry, would notice the lack of public interest and stop inviting him.

The reality is that the people running the Economist, the Financial Times, “60 Minutes,” the New Yorker and many other organizations that have recently sought to feature Bannon know he is an intelligent and influential ideologist, a man who built the largest media platform for the new right, ran Trump’s successful campaign before serving in the White House, and continues to articulate and energize the populism that’s been on the rise throughout the Western world. He might be getting his 15 minutes of fame that will peter out, but, for now, he remains a compelling figure.

The real fear that many on the left have is not that Bannon is dull and uninteresting, but the opposite — that his ideas, some of which can reasonably be described as evoking white nationalism, will prove seductive and persuasive to too many people. Hence his detractors’ solution: Don’t give him a platform, and hope that this will make his ideas go away. But they won’t. In fact, by trying to suppress Bannon and others on the right, liberals are likely making their ideas seem more potent. Did the efforts of communist countries to muzzle capitalist ideas work?

Liberals need to be reminded of the origins of their ideology. In 1859, when governments around the world were still deeply repressive — banning books, censoring commentary and throwing people in jail for their beliefs — John Stuart Mill explained in his seminal work, “On Liberty,” that protection against governments was not enough: “There needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling; against the tendency of society to impose . . . its own ideas and practices . . . on those who dissent from them.” This classic defense of free speech, which Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes later called the “freedom for the thought that we hate,” is under pressure in the United States — and from the left.

This belief that because one is or was a public figure they then have unfettered right to speak wherever they like on whatever they like is bullshit. If Bannon said what he says in Americha over here he'd be rightly done for hate speech. And frankly, Rice should have to defend herself before a war crimes tribunal before being allowed a single paying gig more.

You know, we on the left and in the centre get continuously slaughtered over protesting the leeway the far right (which includes the vast majority of right wing parties at this stage) get on the public stage by the same people who are taking massive concrete steps to shut everybody else up. The levels of censorship against those who don't toe to right wing orthodoxy today is a chilling destruction of freedom of speech.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion - by Pat Mustard - September 28, 2018 at 8:20 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Face coverings in public banned Silver 10 1499 March 10, 2021 at 6:13 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Secular Spirituality in Public Schools chimp3 12 1619 January 23, 2020 at 4:37 am
Last Post: Sal
  The unvaccinated banned from public. brewer 4 746 March 26, 2019 at 9:55 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Saudi Arabia: Reports of torture and sexual harassment of detained activists WinterHold 0 372 January 27, 2019 at 4:56 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  This Figures.... Minimalist 2 619 September 10, 2018 at 11:29 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  And this figures, too Minimalist 0 446 September 10, 2018 at 6:16 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Sexual Harassment Plagues Canadian Parliament And Senate Amarok 1 956 February 2, 2018 at 7:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Iowa bill for bible class in public school brewer 20 4329 January 27, 2018 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Your opinion of "mental defect" in law..... Brian37 9 2327 November 17, 2017 at 1:44 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Another Kentucky Public Official Who Doesn't Know the Law Crossless2.0 11 2914 July 15, 2016 at 8:12 am
Last Post: Little lunch



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)