Peterson's 12 Rules for Life v2.0-- actual book discussion

[paulpablo]

In the case that Jordan Peterson was talking about the woman listed being able to move house where she wants to as an example of a tangible asset confered by identification as being white.

There often is a component of white privilege in where we can live.  Assuming one has the economic means to overcome that, there remains a difference in how a person might be able to live there in the absence of that privilege.  

This is false for the obvious reason that it isn't granted to white people and she didn't get that privilege by being white.

You don't know what white privilege is, so how could you determine that something is true or false?  You seem to think that..even in this instance, the privilege being referred to is akin to someone being granted a house on the basis of their being white. The white version of 40acres and a mule, lol.

I'm commenting on the same list Jordan Peterson is commenting on and the way it's presented.

If her list is what white privilege is then I'd simply suggest a name change more suitable, like "Jane Doe" privilege or whatever her name is.
Because it's her privilege and not a privilege for white people