(September 22, 2011 at 4:11 am)thebigfudge Wrote:
I have seen recent studies where they tried to quantifiably test prayer and it failed. I wasn’t aware the definition used here required that my evidence be either conclusive or objective. Actually, healing children of leukemia as well as other purported terminal illnesses happens quite a lot (the before, pray, after method) as well as with other cancer patients. It is measurable and cumulatively it is indicative evidence for me that prayer works. I requested something of the Abrahamic God, it happened. I requested it from some other diety or not at all, it doesn’t happen. I can’t see something this cut and dry as confirmation bias. Please enlighten me.
(September 22, 2011 at 4:49 am)ElDinero Wrote:1- God was allowing me to have free will to stray from the path he preferred for me. I agree the meeting and reward would have taken place regardless. I asked my boss this morning what caused him to submit the paperwork. He said, “something just told me I needed to”. And he’s moderately religious. That’s not the point though. Please explain how the timing of everything as well as the quantities matched up so exactly to my request.
2- One and a half to 2 weeks and it was day 2 or 3. I’m aware it could have been a placebo, then a few months ago he scraped his knee and leg rally bad falling off his Bike. He wanted me to pray for him, but honestly he was doing stupid tricks and while I felt bad that my son was in pain, I had told him not to play on the bike ramp with the big boys. I prayed with him, letting him do most of the talking and my only thoughts regarding his wounds were “you did it to yourself” mentality. The pain didn’t instantly cease, despite the fact that verbally the 2 prayers were practically the same, merely the intents and causes were different. Would the same placebo affect worked on him a second time?
My child rearing is fairly open-minded and he can think and choose whatever he likes, I don’t force him to believe anything, so let’s keep parenting quips and digs to a minimum, as you don’t know me from Adam. To answer your other question how is it proof of God, it’s not, it’s proof that my prayer got answered. The fact when I pray to Shiva or Minerva or Luna they don’t get answered is indicative of the authoring power.
(September 23, 2011 at 7:45 am)Ace Otana Wrote:Simple: God had everything to do with the timing, and intention of those particular causalities. You deem it irrational because you are a materialist, yet I’m getting chided for confirmation bias?
At no time did I state that I was deserving of more help than anyone else, or that there weren’t more worthy uses of God’s power. Let’s not turn this into a POE issue, Ace. You know me far better than to think I’m anything less than a philanthropic do gooder. I’d much rather God send a cure for AIDS than cure my son’s booboos, but that’s not what I prayed for, which is the point. This is a distraction to the point; let’s not derail this conversation anymore. I mean unless you guys really don’t want to talk about Evidence for God, then I don’t know why everyone just doesn’t let the topic die.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari