| Poll: Should we be more humanitarian towards the fish we eat? This poll is closed. |
|||
| No. I don't believe they suffer the same way other animals do. | 0 | 0% | |
| No. Their suffering is unimportant compared to the good that harvesting them accomplishes. | 0 | 0% | |
| No. It's not a good thing, but there is no practical solution. | 2 | 11.76% | |
| No. I don't care about animal suffering, fish least of all. | 1 | 5.88% | |
| Yes. Fish deserve a humane death just as other animals do. | 6 | 35.29% | |
| Yes. Human suffering is most important, but we shouldn't needlessly cause suffering. | 1 | 5.88% | |
| Other. | 2 | 11.76% | |
| Flipper says, "Fuck all polls!" (Although it sounded a lot like, "Squee! Squee! Squee!") | 5 | 29.41% | |
| Total | 17 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Should we be more humanitarian towards the fish we eat?
|
 RE: Should we be more humanitarian towards the fish we eat?
October 29, 2018 at 12:23 am
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2018 at 12:24 am by vulcanlogician.)
I chose the option that they deserve a humane death. But I was toying with "other." Being extracted from the sea and suffocated is far more human than being made to live in a stall in which one cannot turn around for one's entire life, after all.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
