RE: Objective Morality?
September 26, 2011 at 7:51 pm
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2011 at 7:54 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(September 26, 2011 at 5:38 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Nope, it takes threats of hell and repeated harassment to that effect to cross the line into bigotry (or something similar to that effect). Not that I could teach you anything about bigotry.
Whoa now wait a second here, if someone objects to homosexuality they are automatically a bigot but if they object to adultery they are not? I smell some illogical reasoning going on here on your part. Why apply the rule to one but not the other?
(September 26, 2011 at 7:02 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: False equivocation. Adultery is a betrayal of trust. Since it injures another party, a case that it is immoral is much easier than love between people with similar body parts.
By the way, maybe you can answer this question, as no other Christian could. Why does love become evil when the body parts are similar?
Oh! So if you commit adultery and don’t get caught then it’s no longer wrong because you didn’t actually do any harm to anyone?
Homosexuality is wrong because it is contrary to God’s decreed will. (EDITED for clarification).
