RE: Federal Judge Orders White House To Temporarily Restore Press Access To Jim Acosta
November 17, 2018 at 10:16 pm
(November 17, 2018 at 10:08 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(November 17, 2018 at 10:05 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: You are wrong.... and I’m not going to discuss appeals to motives here.
As
Fine. Then explain how your definition of liberal is relevant to the issues under discussion.
As I explained previously I think it is a broad and non literal interpretation of the constitution, that is not taking a literal approach to the context and intent of the authors. It is prooftexting (note the ommision of under the law from quotes) and therefore is trying to appeal to it as an authority, but not using the original intent or meaning of the writings. If you think that it is applicable, then please explain what due process under the law means in this context. Specifically the word law. I think that being given special access to the White House is a priveledge and not part of the rights given to all by the constitution.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
