RE: Federal Judge Orders White House To Temporarily Restore Press Access To Jim Acosta
November 17, 2018 at 11:03 pm
(November 17, 2018 at 10:55 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(November 17, 2018 at 10:46 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: So just an appeal to authority with no thoughts of your own on the matter? This has nothing to do with politics, and if you have nothing more than judge said so... I find no reason to change my mind. While I respect the judges authority, without other reason, I think he is out of line in voting the 5th amendment. While I don’t endorse uninformed opinions, I think that we can reasonably discuss things, even when not an expert on the matter.
You haven't discussed things, simply asserted a political opinion. If you had done otherwise I might be more sympathetic.
I've given reasons for my opinion..... People have ignored what the law is in this case for due process under the law. The have not addressed, that this press pass is a special privilege given to some, and not a right given to all. And I haven't seen anyone reply why the obvious context of criminal matters in the clauses of the 5th amendment should be applied or ignored here. And I haven't been talking about politics at all (perhaps that is more of a reason for yourself). If you only want to discuss me, and what you falsely attribute to me, things that I didn't say; then forgive me, but I'm more interested in discussing the ideas and the reasoning, and whether the decision is right or wrong. I'm going to respectfully bow out, if where not going to talk about the topic at hand, and you are going to unjustifiably and incorrectly assert my position for me.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther