My proofs for Islam

[Angrboda]

...and we will look at very elaborate version of the moral argument...

You aren't competent in handling even basic arguments, why would we want to listen to you regarding anything complicated or elaborate?

---

---

This is why there are so many threads littering the boards about this one idiotic argument.  MK never gets past the assertion phase.  Rinse and repeat ad infinitum. 

This is amusing, because, if we imagine some universe in which something like this argument can be made to be lucid, at least, some sort of commitment to that and to the argument and a continuing duiscussion of it, rather than fitful starting and stopping at the same point, would be required to arrive at this state of affairs.  I'm not sure that anyone who finds such an argument compelling, or has even an ounce of respect for the argument or whatever valid and plausible form it might be couched in, could be so careless and uninterested.

Is this argument or it's conclusion, is the notion that the moongod can be rationally argued, even, valued?  Or are these yet more illusions?

He'd probably be more successful stealing from the playbook of the Platonists, but he won't do that because that would require reading a different book.