I don't know what dictionary your all using, but mine clearly states the following:
a·the·ism/ˈāTHēˌizəm/
Noun: The theory or belief that God does not exist.
These are the threats I was referring to, it's OK to be scared ElDinero. Only those who fear they are wrong need to implement censorship. Ban me if it helps you maintain the bubble you live in, otherwise stop threatening me.
God is not a teapot. Unlike an object a God is a force/being which cannot be clearly perceived by humans. God is a concept, something which encompasses the entire universe, exists in every atom of the universe. Therefore arguments for the existence of God(s) must not rely on physical, tangible evince as there is none. Your comparison of God to a teapot shows how little you understand what a theist means when they say 'God(s)'.
I will provide you with an argument for the existence of God(s): Ockham's razor.
a·the·ism/ˈāTHēˌizəm/
Noun: The theory or belief that God does not exist.
(September 28, 2011 at 8:44 am)ElDinero Wrote: Now I've been kind enough to give you some pointers on how to interact here without getting banned
These are the threats I was referring to, it's OK to be scared ElDinero. Only those who fear they are wrong need to implement censorship. Ban me if it helps you maintain the bubble you live in, otherwise stop threatening me.
(September 28, 2011 at 8:44 am)ElDinero Wrote: Obviously you don't believe that the Teapot exists, and the burden would be on the claimant to prove it exists, not for you to disprove it.
God is not a teapot. Unlike an object a God is a force/being which cannot be clearly perceived by humans. God is a concept, something which encompasses the entire universe, exists in every atom of the universe. Therefore arguments for the existence of God(s) must not rely on physical, tangible evince as there is none. Your comparison of God to a teapot shows how little you understand what a theist means when they say 'God(s)'.
I will provide you with an argument for the existence of God(s): Ockham's razor.
