RE: Federal Judge Orders White House To Temporarily Restore Press Access To Jim Acosta
November 18, 2018 at 6:29 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2018 at 6:31 pm by RoadRunner79.)
(November 18, 2018 at 6:27 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: The white house couldn't tell the judge presiding what the constitution says..in fact, they could tell the judge presiding nothing at all. This is what lead to the pass being reinstated.
I think that is because that is not a constitutional right covered or granted by the constitution. Which would explain why only some have it, and not all.
(November 18, 2018 at 6:29 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(November 18, 2018 at 6:27 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: The white house couldn't tell the judge presiding what the constitution says..in fact, they could tell the judge presiding nothing at all. This is what lead to the pass being reinstated.
I think that is because that is not a constitutional right covered or granted by the constitution. Which would explain why only some have it, and not all.
I've granted a number of things, and as I've said, I don't have an issue with them saying that they can't do so without reason. It's just the liberal interpretation of the 5th amendment which I think is wrong.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
