(September 28, 2011 at 8:58 am)Jesuslovesyou Wrote: These are the threats I was referring to, it's OK to be scared ElDinero. Only those who fear they are wrong need to implement censorship. Ban me if it helps you maintain the bubble you live in, otherwise stop threatening me.
God is not a teapot. Unlike an object a God is a force/being which cannot be clearly perceived by humans. God is a concept, something which encompasses the entire universe, exists in every atom of the universe. Therefore arguments for the existence of God(s) must not rely on physical, tangible evince as there is none. Your comparison of God to a teapot shows how little you understand what a theist means when they say 'God(s)'.
I will provide you with an argument for the existence of God(s): Ockham's razor.
I'm not threatening you. I'm not even a moderator, so can't ban you. I was pointing out that you agreed to the forum rules when you joined, which include not preaching, which is what you were doing in your first several posts. Believe me if you continue to do it, you will be banned, and it's nothing to do with being scared of your presumably brilliant evidence that nobody else has ever shown us before. Now, you seem to have settled down and are attempting to begin reasonable discourse, so that's fine.
You are possibly being obtuse with regards Russell's Teapot, but if you're being sincere, you've missed the point completely. The point is you are asking people to disprove God, but that isn't how the burden of proof works. Otherwise I could ask you to disprove anything (like the teapot). The burden of proof rests with the claimant.
As I said, there is a thread already dedicated to this topic in the religion sub-forum. You say you have proof, so take a trip over there and let's have it.
