RE: Science can prove a god must exist
September 29, 2011 at 9:19 am
(This post was last modified: September 29, 2011 at 9:23 am by Zaki Aminu.)
(September 29, 2011 at 9:17 am)Rhythm Wrote: It is only so if you can prove it, which you have not, and cannot.
Your claim that I have not proved it is just a claim - nothing more. Or have you got proof to back you up?
(September 29, 2011 at 9:18 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:(September 29, 2011 at 9:12 am)Zaki Aminu Wrote:(September 29, 2011 at 9:10 am)Rhythm Wrote: Where's Tristo to offer up his "chess with pigeons" analogy?
That's one way of admitting you've lost. Not very gracious though. You're not likely to learn from the experience that way. Pity.
(September 29, 2011 at 9:10 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: I like to know how he explains his existence? And is he alluding to quantum physics?
which really IS the "ultimate reality"
The very attempt to prove my existence proves it beyond doubt - since I could not make the attempt, or indeed do anything, if I did not exist first. Is this not so?
Ahh circular reasoning??
Could you describe where you see a circle? Can someone not ALREADY existing perform ANY act? Or even contemplate the performance of ANY act?
