(September 29, 2011 at 12:04 pm)frankiej Wrote: If someone shows you evidence, it isn't their fault that you can't interpret it logically.
There has to be an objective measure of "evidence" otherwise it doesn't really mean anything! Scientists can't do their work without standard measures - very precise standard measures. So to refuse to subscribe to a standard by which evidence can be objectively adjudicated is not being very scientific - or logical - is it?