RE: Science can prove a god must exist
September 29, 2011 at 2:00 pm
(This post was last modified: September 29, 2011 at 2:09 pm by Jackalope.)
(September 29, 2011 at 10:05 am)Welsh cake Wrote:(September 29, 2011 at 9:54 am)Zaki Aminu Wrote: And why does it annoy you anyway?Because you feeling the need to emphasis every occasional word comes off as condescending and obnoxious? We can read.
It's also intellectually dishonest to add emphasis to text you're quoting without indicating that the emphasis is added, and not present in the original text.
(September 29, 2011 at 1:09 pm)Zaki Aminu Wrote: But I DON'T want to talk about "god". I want to talk about Ultimate Reality. You don't mind, do you?
Please explain why, if you don't want to talk about "god", that you chose to hijack a thread titled "Science can prove a god must exist".
I suspect I already know the answer.
If you want to talk about "Ultimate Reality", start your own thread and keep your pseudo-philisophical drivel there.