Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Religions make extraordinary claims but provide, at best, philosophical arguments for a generic god (not even necessarily the one they're trying to promote).
If this is as good as you can do, you've failed to meet your burden of proof.
Religions make extraordinary claims but provide, at best, philosophical arguments for a generic god (not even necessarily the one they're trying to promote).
If this is as good as you can do, you've failed to meet your burden of proof.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
