First order logic, set theory and God

[DeistPaladin]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. 

I'll ask you to kindly toss that vague nonsense in the trash can - as you may have noticed, what one considers to be an extraordinary evidence may be interpreted as a perfectly ordinary and acceptable evidence by another.

I won't be tossing anything aside for your benefit. Instead, I'll remind you that you have, at best, philosophical arguments to prove the extraordinary claim that there is a god, that this One True God is Allah and that Mohammed is his prophet. 

The caliber of evidence needed to meet that burden would be something along the lines of miracles performed under peer review, magical artifacts that can be examined by science or supernatural beings testifying before a live audience. You haven't done this. You can't do this. If religions had such evidence, they would not require faith. 

Faith, of course, is believing impossible nonsense with no evidence and defending these beliefs against all evidence. 

You have failed to meet your burden of proof. Take your junk philosophy and verbal snake oil to someplace where it will matter, to wavering Muslims of weak faith that need some reassurance they haven't been conned by religion.