(December 4, 2018 at 1:12 am)dr0n3 Wrote: Along with that nonsensical vague statement of yours, I will also ask you to dispose of those red herrings in the trash can. As stated in the OP, you were asked to provide a well-thought-out counterargument to hatcher's proof and point out any inconsistencies therein, which, by the nature of your post, you've miserably failed to do so. Without that, all your self-aggrandizing drivel is just that, meaningless hogwash. If you're not satisfied with the evidence, you can either leave, or engage in a meaningful and fruitful dialogue. As for the caliber of evidence you require, you won't have it - and if that's an issue for you, well you can always shove your right hand where the sun doesn't shine and find your god up there.Yeah I pretty much have you pegged: The Pompous Apologist.
Unfortunately, your haughty demeanor doesn't compensate for your lack of evidence. You have failed and will continue to fail to meet your burden of proof. That's the reason you could post your junk philosophy on a thousand atheist forums and not get a single convert to Islam.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
