RE: First order logic, set theory and God
December 4, 2018 at 5:14 pm
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2018 at 5:16 pm by Bucky Ball.)
Any argument for (a) cause is really nothing but "proximate" cause, (as I used to say on TTA, and I think Gae Bolga may have also come up with it here, independently).
Any omnipotent deity could have created a race of robot universe makers, and any one of them fulfill any "logic" they (arguers for a "cause") lay out.
It leads nowhere. It does not have to lead to the gods.
Any omnipotent deity could have created a race of robot universe makers, and any one of them fulfill any "logic" they (arguers for a "cause") lay out.
It leads nowhere. It does not have to lead to the gods.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell ![Popcorn Popcorn](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
![Popcorn Popcorn](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist