RE: First order logic, set theory and God
December 6, 2018 at 9:24 am
(This post was last modified: December 6, 2018 at 9:24 am by GrandizerII.)
So ... now that I've fully read the OP, I went through the first two to three pages of this thread, and it turns out that first Jorm and then Khem/Gae already pointed out the one problem that stands out with the argument: that the first cause need not be a supernatural God, even if the OP decides to call it "God" anyway.
So Belaqua, you were being unfair in saying that no one effectively addressed the argument earlier.
Really, that was all that was needed to be pointed out. I admit on the basis of my full reading of the OP, my initial counterargument was overkill.
So Belaqua, you were being unfair in saying that no one effectively addressed the argument earlier.
Really, that was all that was needed to be pointed out. I admit on the basis of my full reading of the OP, my initial counterargument was overkill.