(September 30, 2011 at 8:45 am)Zen Badger Wrote:(September 30, 2011 at 8:34 am)Zaki Aminu Wrote:(September 30, 2011 at 8:32 am)Zen Badger Wrote:(September 30, 2011 at 8:26 am)Zaki Aminu Wrote:(September 30, 2011 at 8:18 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Since the blind can still detect light via scientific means your anology sucks arse.
If they can detect light, they can't be blind, can they? Sheeeesh!
I'm talking about the really blind. Not the merely partially blind. You fellows really hate clarity, do you not? You need the swamp of confusion to swim in like fish need water to swim in.
Even the totally blind can detect light via ways other than sight.
So your anology still sucks arse.
Hahahahahahahahah! If they can detect light IN ANY WAY they cannot - BY DEFINITION - be totally blind! My word - I have to explain this to you? Do you see what disrespecting words does to you?
Even a man who's eyes have been totally removed would be able to detect sunlight via the warmth he would feel on his skin.
Also he could hear it via a radio tuned to a high enough frequency(since light is an electro-magnetic radiation)
So your anology STILL SUCKS ARSE
Hahahahahahahahaha! So detecting the warmth of sunlight is now redefined by you as "sight", is it? Hahahahahahahahahahha! Gordon Bennett!
