Anti Trans And Why It Fails

[Amarok]

I'm glad you're happy. Kudos for asking a relevant question! My answer is actually... "I don't know what the answer is, but I know what the answer isn't." In fact, I'm not even sure that more laws will be the answer, and here's why.

Laws provide moral guidance in any society; laws also force those who break them (except for criminal cases) to at least be willing to commit perjury.

So let's recap shall we 

Me a persons who's job has lead them to help trans people get jobs  and homes  and deal with suicide as well as reunite families who have rejected their Trans members . Decides to write a thread attacking the ontological objections to transgender and does so accurately  and makes damn clear in their opening statement that this isn't exhaustive list of objections nor a refutation of political objections by the nature of the post. 

On the other we have a man who brings up a bunch of shit that has nothing to do with the intention of the thread and fails even at that. All the while chewing out the author they aren't doing anything and just wanting praise despite they above  . Then when challenged to come up with a solution of his own all he has is "I got nothing but no more laws " all the while siding with an ideology that has not only done nothing for the trans community but has openly attacked it.