(January 10, 2019 at 8:53 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 10, 2019 at 8:30 pm)Brian37 Wrote: I never claimed there was evidence of any super natural cognition. Theists do that not me.
I say humans make up those claims as a reflection of their own qualities, desires, narcissism and insecurities. Just like a dog will bark at it's own reflection in a mirror.
Otherwise my odds of dating Angelina Joile are 100%.
But somehow, I think you are smart enough to get my sarcasm in knowing it is a snarky way of wishing.
- No, you said the opposite and asserted "no evidence." So by what authority are you claiming an absolute?
0 = None = Absolutely nothing
To declare this, wouldn't you need to be an authority to declare what is evidence and what isn't? If someone else says they've shared or found evidence, by what authority do you declare their claims null?
- My dog didn't barked. I "barked" at him and told him to come on. He listened. If it wasn't around 2 am, I probably wouldn't have minded him trying to figure it out.
- So you attribute a special value to Angelina and the possibility of dating her. If you assume it impossible, then it probably won't happen, but if you believe it can happen, then your odds are probably better.
Yes I did say there is no evidence And?
If every claim is true until proven false then I am dating Angelina Jolie because you cant prove I am not.
